Community First: Civil Society Groups Developing their Own Infrastructure

About 50 civil society groups attended the Community First session at St Martins in the Bull Ring – the latest chance for groups to influence the TLI proposal in Birmingham and to find out more about Community First neighbourhood matched funding.  Details are on the Chamberlain Forum website alongside information about the Community First funding.

The relevance of Community First to TLI is two-fold:

1) Community First funding depends on frontline civil society groups – like neighbourhood forums and residents’ associations forming their own infrastructure in the form of Community Panels;

2) the fund is a matched fund – which means Community Panels are going to be raising resources to match the funding from government.  This means that timebanks, local lotteries, local private sector support and other initiatives are on the agenda for civil society groups.

The meeting re-iterated the need for Birmingham’s Transforming Local Infrastructure proposal to focus on the needs of civil society groups: ‘any money should be spent on enabling self-help between groups and providing high quality, timely and appropriate advice and information for frontline groups, not disappear into the back pockets of  large ‘infrastructure bodies’ and professional charities.’

 

 

Community First Meeting

Resident and community groups, voluntary groups and others are welcome to join the Chamberlain Forum Resident University meeting at St Martins in the Bull Ring Tea Lounge B5 5BB 6-7.30pm on Tuesday 18 October.

The main purpose of the meeting will be to look at the new Community First fund which will provide £2m in matched funding for small grants in 27 of Birmingham’s 40 wards.  The meeting will also take an update on the Birmingham Transforming Local Infrastructure proposal.

All are welcome, but please confirm your attendance (so we can get the right number of tea and biscuits ready) contacting info@chamberlainforum.org or tel: 07795 448 462

Featured: Building Society, Transforming Infrastructure

With talk of a ‘broken’ society – recent looting and violence on our streets – this Resident University workshop is for the people and groups who are building society to give their views on Transforming Local Infrastructure.

Weds 21st Sept 6.30pm – Bull Ring – Birmingham
Download the Flyer

Building Society is an opportunity for grassroots community and voluntary groups of all sorts to meet and share views of the important job they do in building and maintaining civil society.  It’s also a chance to influence the support they get – including a £600,000 proposal to transform infrastructure support for community groups in Birmingham (see the Birmingham Transforming Local Infrastructure website).

Continue reading

Proposals for Transforming Local Infrastructure

Chamberlain Forum’s proposals for projects to include in Birmingham’s TLI proposal (building on the Forum’s vision for the bid – Three Steps to Power) were submitted to BVSC and the panel of civil society groups acting on behalf of the partnership in Birmingham on 17 August.

C Forum BTLI programme ideas

Each of the groups that applied to join the TLI partnership in Birmingham gave details of projects they felt should be priorities.

Vision: Three Steps to Power!

Chamberlain Forum has put forward some ideas relating to a vision for the Birmingham Transforming Local Infastructure proposal.  They are centred on the idea of civil society groups as links in wider civil society.  The vision document called Three Steps to Power can be downloaded below.

The Forum has also said that it will host a meeting on Wednesday 21st September 6-9pm at St Martins in the Bull Ring for civil society groups and infrastructure bodies to discuss what kind of support groups in Birmingham actually want.  If you would like to support the event, promote it or get involvolved in planning it, then please contact Chamberlain Forum (but be aware that responses to enquiries will be slow until 30th August due to staff leave!)

Birmingham Transforming Local Infrastructure vision

Civil Society Panel for BTLI Proposal

BVSC is putting together a panel of representatives of civil society groups in Birmingham to assess the partnership credentials of infrastructure bodies that want to be involved in developing the £600k proposal to transform support for civil society in the city.  The size of the panel isn’t yet set, but the aim is to include a wide range of groups including small groups.

The first task of the panel members will be to look at the partnership forms filled in by would-be partners in the programme and to decide who should be included.  The forms are due in by Monday 22 August and decisions will be made by the following Friday.  The panel will have an ongoing role in deciding which projects get included in the proposed programme which will be submitted to Big Lottery Fund in September.  It’s a competitive process – Birmingham isn’t assured it will get any money… a really good bid that clearly meets the needs of frontline civil society groups will be what funders are looking for.

If you are interested in serving on the panel, then get in touch with BVSC at tli@bvsc.org with your name and group name and contact details and, please, post a comment on this website too!

 

Meeting 11th August

Representatives of organisations that have registered to be part of the Transforming Local Infrastructure partnership in Birmingham met at BVSC on Thursday 11th August.  At the meeting, partners introduced themselves and listed ideas they would like to see included in the proposal.  Brian Carr of BVSC announced his organisation was prepared to lead the partnership.  Ray Goodwin of the Birmingham Development Agency Network and Tony Clabby of The Digbeth Trust expressed their support for BVSC to lead as did several other partners during the course of the meeting.

It’s about Civil Society…

Ray Goodwin went on to say that he felt the proposal was about transforming infrastructure organisations rather than delivery.  Paul Slatter of Chamberlain Forum pointed out that it was not about transforming infrastructure organisations, as such, but about transforming infrastructure: whatever is proposed has to deliver real change in the support available to civil society groups.

Continue reading